Juma v. Aomo, 148 A.3d 255, 168 Conn. App. 845 (2016)

Oct. 11, 2016 · Connecticut Appellate Court · AC 37880
148 A.3d 255, 168 Conn. App. 845

Jacqueline O. Juma
v.
Tom M. Aomo

AC 37880

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued September 7, 2016
Officially released October 11, 2016

Tom M. Aomo, self-represented, the appellant (defendant).

Lavine, Mullins and Mihalakos, Js.

PER CURIAM.

*846The self-represented defendant, Tom M. Aomo, appeals from the postdissolution judgment of the trial court, reinstating the financial orders issued at the time of dissolution.1 The trial court, Olear, J. , dissolved the marriage of the defendant and the self-represented plaintiff, Jacqueline O. Juma,2 on July 1, 2011, and issued *256financial orders with respect to the defendant's child support and alimony obligations. See Juma v. Aomo , 143 Conn.App. 51, 54, 68 A.3d 148 (2013). The defendant subsequently became unemployed, and the parties agreed that his financial obligations should be modified downward. On November 5, 2013, the court, Ficeto, J. , revised its financial orders *847downward and entered certain orders regarding the arrearage the defendant owed the plaintiff. Thereafter, defendant found new employment, and, on December 10, 2014, the plaintiff filed a motion to modify child support and alimony asking the trial court to reinstate its original financial orders in the judgment of dissolution. Following a hearing, Judge Ficeto granted the plaintiff's motion to modify child support and alimony, reinstating the defendant's financial obligations pursuant to the judgment of dissolution. On the basis of our thorough review of the record, and after considering the record and the defendant's brief and argument, we conclude that there is no error. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.