Jason P. Mitchell ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2012) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Mitchell v. State, 578 S.W.3d 858 (2019)
July 23, 2019
·
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
·
No. ED 106594
578 S.W.3d 858
Jason P. MITCHELL, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 106594
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
FILED: July 23, 2019
Katharine P. Curry, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.
ORDER