Chambers v. Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp., 824 S.E.2d 404 (2019)

March 27, 2019 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · No. 147PA18
824 S.E.2d 404
Christopher CHAMBERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation d/b/a Moses Cone Health System and d/b/a Cone Health; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

Christopher CHAMBERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v.
The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation d/b/a Moses Cone Health System and d/b/a Cone Health; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

No. 147PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Barry L. Kramer, Attorney at Law, for Chambers, Christopher.

Philip J. Mohr, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Brent Fancher Powell, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Carol L. Brooke, Attorney at Law, Jack Holtzman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Clermont F. Ripley, Attorney at Law, William R. Corbett, Attorney at Law, Deborah Goldstein, Attorney at Law, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of May 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of June 2018 by Plaintiff to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).