delivered the opinion of the court.
Berg v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad, 186 Ill. App. 294 (1914)
April 15, 1914
·
Illinois Appellate Court
·
Gen. No. 5,881
186 Ill. App. 294
Hannah Berg, Administratrix, Appellee, v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
Gen. No. 5,881.
(Not to be reported in full.)
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Leslie D. Putebbaugh, Judge, presiding.
Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.
Reversed with finding of facts.
Opinion filed April 15, 1914.
Statement of the Case.
Action by Hannah Berg, administratrix of the estate of John W. F. Berg, deceased, against Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company and Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Company to recover for the wrongful death of deceased while employed by the Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Company as a section man in its yards. His duty was to clean up and do various things about the yards. The deceased was killed by falling *295between the first and second coaches of a passenger train of the Lake Erie & Western Eailroad Company, a lessee of the other defendant Company. He stepped back from a track where he was working to make way for an engine of the Vandalia Eailroad Company that was approaching in one direction, and either while the engine was passing or just after it had passed he came into contact with the Lake Erie coaches going in the other direction. There was a space of about eight feet between the tracks and about four feet between trains if standing at the same time on these two tracks. From a judgment entered on a verdict for two thousand five hundred dollars against both defendants, defendants appeal.
Stevens, Miller & Elliott, for appellants.
Sheen & Galbraith, for appellee.
Abstract of the Decision.
Master and servant, § 704 * -—when recovery for death of a section man while working in railroad yards not sustained by the evidence. In an action against two railroad companies to recover ior the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, a section man, employed by one of the defendant companies in its yards, it appeared that the deceased was killed by falling between the coaches of a passenger train of the other company after he had stepped off a track where he was working to let the engine of another company, not a party to the suit, pass, and that deceased, was killed while he was standing between the two passing trains. Held that a verdict and judgment against the defendants could not be sustained, there being no evidence to show what caused the deceased to fall between the coaches, and the evidence failing to show that defendants or either of them owed him any duty which was not performed, and the evidence failed to show ordinary care on the part of the deceased at the time of the injury.